By Brian Huot, Peggy O'Neill, Cindy Moore

Whereas such a lot English pros believe pleased with language and literacy theories, evaluation theories appear extra alien. English execs usually don’t have a transparent knowing of the most important innovations in academic dimension, similar to validity and reliability, nor do they comprehend the statistical formulation linked to psychometrics. yet knowing evaluate theory—and utilising it—by people who are now not psychometricians is important in constructing precious, moral exams in collage writing courses, and in reading and utilizing review effects.

A consultant to varsity Writing Assessment is designed as an advent and resource publication for WPAs, division chairs, lecturers, and directors. consistently cognizant of the severe elements of specific educating contexts, O’Neill, Moore, and Huot have written refined yet obtainable chapters at the background, thought, software and historical past of writing evaluate, and so they provide a dozen appendices of functional samples and versions for more than a few universal overview wishes.

simply because there are many assets on hand to help college in assessing the writing of person scholars specifically school rooms, A consultant to school Writing evaluate focuses on methods to the types of review that usually take place open air of person school rooms: placement overview, go out exam, programmatic overview, and school assessment. so much of all, the argument of this ebook is that developing the stipulations for significant university writing evaluation hinges not just on figuring out the heritage and theories informing overview perform, but in addition on composition courses availing themselves of the complete diversity of obtainable review practices.

Uploader liberate Notes:
HQ PDF, has OCR & bookmarks

Show description

Read Online or Download A Guide to College Writing Assessment PDF

Similar pedagogy books

What We Really Value: Beyond Rubrics in Teaching and Assessing Writing

As worthwhile as they've been, the good weak spot of departmental writing rubrics lies in what they pass over. They current a handful of inarguably vital standards through which writing might be evaluated, yet they put out of your mind dozens of different standards (such as "interest," "tone," or "commitment") wherein any rhetorical functionality can be prone to be judged.

Teaching Composition As A Social Process

McComiskey argues for instructing writing as located in discourse itself, within the consistent circulate of texts produced inside of social relationships and associations. this can be a paintings with a cosmopolitan thought base and entire of examples from McComiskey's personal school rooms.

Resisting Linguistic Imperialism in English Teaching (Oxford Applied Linguistics)

This ebook explores how English is utilized in outer edge groups, whereas subtly resisting the linguistic imperialism from the worldwide ELT company.

Becoming an Evidence-based Practitioner: A Framework for Teacher-Researchers

This publication is for academics who're having a look, or being inspired, to adopt study of their faculties. Written by way of academics and their HE learn mentors, the publication indicates lecturers the best way to 'do' and 'use' learn and the way to 'do' potent pedagogy.

Additional resources for A Guide to College Writing Assessment

Sample text

Historicizing Writing Assessment 31 CONCLUSION If testing in general and writing assessment in particular began in the early 1900s or so, then they are about a hundred years old. What’s interesting, maddening, instructive, and usable about this short history is that it appears that in writing assessment, as in most human endeavors, the more things change, the more they remain the same. For example, the creation of the CEEB in the early twentieth century—if not the beginning of formal writing assessment then certainly an important development—signalled some important trends, beliefs, and assumptions that continue with us today.

Nonetheless, the fact that the reliability problem for writing assessment has been solved once and for all with computer scoring does not mean a blank check for validity. The limitations of computer or automated scoring have to be factored into any argument for making specific decisions based upon writing assessment data generated by computer analysis of student writing. Of course, it was never really true that writing teachers could not agree with each other. Even Paul Diederich of ETS knew that in the early 1950s, though the small population of raters who agreed with each other in his study did not satisfy his needs for large readings (1950).

At the college level, SAT and ACT scores are still considered significant factors in admission decisions at most universities and four-year colleges, with many using these scores in composition placement. With the revised SAT and its writing section (multiple choice and timed essay) there is potential for standardized tests to have a greater effect on access and curriculum through placement. Of course, many institutions already use commercial test products, such as COMPASS and ACCUPLACER, to determine students’ entry into the college-writing curriculum—even to award credit or exemption.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.63 of 5 – based on 9 votes