Show description

The L-V model was 30 W. Mazurczyk et al. g. the assumption of constant encounter rates a/a was considered as biologically unrealistic) and a number of other models have been developed. However, ecologists agree that all available models are just special cases of the L-V model, which in turn still remains the most important model for antagonistic interactions among organisms [31]. The models that followed the L-V system focused mostly on making some of its assumptions more realistic. For example, the Nicholson-Bailey model expanded on the results from the L-V system and generalised them to discrete generations of prey and predators (the L-V system was developed under the assumption of continuous overlapping generations).

Evol. Syst. uk Abstract. The following chapter provides an in depth look at a broad selection challenges related to Cybercrime and Cyberterrorism, as identified through prolonged engagement with a multitude of horizontal and vertical cyber-security stakeholders. Out of six critical areas identified, the two leading causes, were through the evolving rate of technology, and, the subsequent lack of education, awareness and training. These two underlying factors further influenced and affected the severity of the additional four critical areas; the capability of investigators, cooperation and information sharing, legislative systems and data protection, and, organisational and societal resilience.

Mazurczyk et al. form a unified group of antagonistic interactions involving the aggressor, the victim and resources that are/may be available to one or both entities [30]. g. via shared resources) effect. In this section we discuss consequences of such a categorization and review the most prominent models of antagonistic interactions, while pinpointing their weaknesses [30]. 1 Similarities Between Parasitic and Predatory Interactions The strong distinction between parasitic and predatory relationships results mostly from an old methodology of categorizing nature [31].