By Hanna Samir Kassab

This booklet seeks to give an explanation for why susceptible states exist in the overseas procedure. utilizing the instances of Armenia, St. Kitts and Nevis, Lebanon, and Cambodia, the writer argues that, if a country is vulnerable and weak, then it will possibly perform an unforeseen measure of relative autonomy unfettered via nice powers.

Show description

Read Online or Download Weak States in International Relations Theory: The Cases of Armenia, St. Kitts and Nevis, Lebanon, and Cambodia PDF

Best diplomacy books

Empire of Ideas: The Origins of Public Diplomacy and the Transformation of U. S. Foreign Policy

Masking the interval from 1936 to 1953, Empire of principles finds how and why photograph first turned an element of international coverage, prompting policymakers to include such options as propaganda, academic exchanges, cultural shows, in another country libraries, and household public family.

Drawing upon exhaustive examine in respectable executive documents and the personal papers of best officers within the Roosevelt and Truman administrations, together with newly declassified fabric, Justin Hart takes the reader again to the sunrise of what Time-Life writer Henry Luce might famously name the "American century," while U. S. policymakers first started to contemplate the nation's picture as a international coverage factor. starting with the Buenos Aires convention in 1936--which grew out of FDR's strong Neighbor coverage towards Latin America--Hart strains the dramatic progress of public international relations within the battle years and past. The booklet describes how the kingdom division validated the location of Assistant Secretary of country for Public and Cultural Affairs in 1944, with Archibald MacLeish--the Pulitzer Prize-winning poet and Librarian of Congress--the first to fill the publish. Hart indicates that the information of MacLeish turned significant to the evolution of public international relations, and his impact will be felt lengthy after his tenure in executive provider ended. The publication examines a large choice of propaganda courses, together with the Voice of the United States, and concludes with the production of the us details business enterprise in 1953, bringing an finish to the 1st part of U. S. public diplomacy.

Empire of principles is still hugely suitable this day, whilst U. S. officers have introduced full-scale propaganda to wrestle adverse perceptions within the Arab global and in other places. Hart's research illuminates the same efforts of a prior iteration of policymakers, explaining why our skill to form our picture is, in any case, really constrained.

The Politics of Protection: The Limits of Humanitarian Action

For the earlier decade, humanitarian actors have more and more sought not just to aid humans tormented by conflicts and typical failures, but in addition to guard them. whilst, safety of civilians has turn into crucial to UN peacekeeping operations, and the UN normal meeting has recommended the main that the foreign neighborhood has the "responsibility to guard" humans while their governments can't or won't accomplish that.

American Allies in Times of War: The Great Asymmetry

Why are allies so unpredictable? In American Allies in instances of battle, Stéfanie von Hlatky tackles this question via analyzing army cooperation among the us and its allies. First, this e-book demonstrates that alliance calls for in instances of battle can't constantly be met via democratic allies because of household political constraints.

Additional resources for Weak States in International Relations Theory: The Cases of Armenia, St. Kitts and Nevis, Lebanon, and Cambodia

Example text

38 W E A K S TAT E S IN I N T E R N AT I O N A L R E L AT I O N S T H E O RY By doing this, weak states can focus on other issues, such as economic growth. This agrees with the Waltzian statement that all states function similarly, but differ by their ability to perform these functions. Nevertheless, by joining alliances to ensure their security, weak states have to give up something to gain this assurance. James Morrow describes alliances between great powers and weak states as asymmetrical, meaning weak states give up their autonomy, more specifically, their foreign policy, in order to gain protection.

No state, or unit of that structure, can alter this framework on its own. This is all part of the ordering system of anarchy. To conclude this section, the international system as described here in terms of great power behavior represents my independent variable. Waltz sees states as similar units made abstract for analytical purposes. However, they are indeed distinguishable by their power. This structure of the international system is defined by three factors. First, by anarchy, that is the lack of an overarching authority.

My research question calls for a comprehensive understanding of context and motivation of specific weak states. Exposing the motivation of a state is an essential task as it highlights the inner workings of my Neoclassical Realist theoretical contribution. This will be done by conducting comparative historical analyses within the proposed framework discussing four cases using two perfect cases and two most different types or “tough” counter cases. These cases are thus grouped into two. The first group explores Armenia (weak state) and St.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.20 of 5 – based on 38 votes