By Neil Tennant
This is often the 1st logically specific, computationally implementable, book-length account of rational trust revision. It explains how a rational agent should continue while adopting a brand new trust - a tricky topic if the hot trust contradicts the agent's previous ideals.
Belief structures are modeled as finite dependency networks. with the intention to attend not just to what the agent believes, but in addition to the diversity of purposes the agent has for thus believing. The computational complexity of the revision challenge is characterised. Algorithms for trust revision are formulated, and applied in Prolog. The implementation assessments good on quite a number easy belief-revision difficulties that pose a number of demanding situations for any account of trust revision.
The thought of 'minimal mutilation' of a trust process is explicated accurately for occasions while the agent is confronted with conflicting ideals. The proposed revision tools are invariant throughout diverse worldwide justificatory buildings (foundationalist, coherentist, etc.). They recognize the instinct that, while revising one's ideals, one are not carry directly to any trust that has misplaced all its former justifications. The dilemma to finite dependency networks is proven to not compromise theoretical generality.
This account provides a unique strategy to argue that there's an inviolable center of logical ideas. those rules, which shape the method of center good judgment, can't be given up, on soreness of no longer with the ability to perform the reasoning excited about rationally revising beliefs.
The ebook ends through evaluating and contrasting the hot account with a few significant representatives of prior replacement methods, from the fields of formal epistemology, synthetic intelligence and mathematical good judgment.
Read or Download Changes of Mind: An Essay on Rational Belief Revision PDF
Similar logic books
Statistical Estimation of Epidemiological Risk provides insurance of an important epidemiological indices, and comprises fresh advancements within the field. A useful reference resource for biostatisticians and epidemiologists operating in disorder prevention, because the chapters are self-contained and have a variety of actual examples.
This paintings introduces the topic of formal good judgment in terms of a procedure that's "like syllogistic logic". Its procedure, like out of date, conventional syllogistic, is a "term logic". The authors' model of common sense ("term-function logic", TFL) stocks with Aristotle's syllogistic the perception that the logical different types of statements which are fascinated about inferences as premises or conclusions may be construed because the results of connecting pairs of phrases via a logical copula (functor).
- Fuzzy Logic and Information Fusion: To commemorate the 70th birthday of Professor Gaspar Mayor
- Goal-Directed Proof Theory
- Advances in Temporal Logic
- Notes on logic
Additional info for Changes of Mind: An Essay on Rational Belief Revision
This Core Logic (so we shall argue) turns out to be intuitionistic relevant logic (IR), whose philosophical, methological and computational credentials the author has presented elsewhere. 12 The new account could also be extended to handle retractions of justificatory steps themselves, in addition to the beliefs serving as their premises and conclusions. That would be the right juncture at which to model the more radical process of revision of one’s logic. In so far as many steps will be justificatory, Loci classici: Gentzen [, ], Prawitz .
Note that to get bogged down with the first question, concerning the right choice of truth bearers, is to opt for philosophical disquisition while sacrificing even the simplest form of system building. If one were to become too obsessed with finding philosophically satisfying answers to all the questions initially raised, one might never get round to building any sort of deductive system. The system-building theorist, however, gets a headstart by being willing to make certain idealizing assumptions, plumping for structures and methods that, it is to be hoped, will prove to be invariant across different resolutions of the philosophical issues raised.
N , then ψ is a logical consequence in L of ϕ1 , . . , ϕn . And here is the definition of completeness: System S of proof is complete for L if and only if for all ϕ1 , . . , ϕn , ψ if ψ is a logical consequence in L of ϕ1 , . . , ϕn , then ψ is deducible (in S) from ϕ1 , . . , ϕn . This brief explanation of the theory of propositional logic will have to suffice, for it is provided only in order to illustrate our methodological point about the need to strike a balance between the demand for simplicity and the demand for comprehensiveness.